Text
The judgment below
The part of the defendant's case shall be reversed.
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for five years.
For the defendant.
Reasons
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. The Defendant and the person subject to a request to attach an attachment order (hereinafter “Defendant”) are guilty of facts as stated in 1. D. and 2. of the judgment of the court below (hereinafter “each of these crimes”)
2) The sentence of imprisonment (six years of imprisonment) imposed by the lower court on the Defendant is too unreasonable.
B. Prosecutor 1) The lower court’s dismissal of the Defendant’s request for the attachment order of this case is unlawful, since the Defendant’s sentence imposed by the lower court against the Defendant is too unfasible and unreasonable. 2) The Defendant’s attachment order of this case is dangerous
2. Determination
A. On April 19, 2014, the summary of the facts charged concerning each of the crimes in this part of the facts charged is as follows: “The defendant committed an indecent act against the juvenile by force, such as: (a) putting the hand into the victim’s inner part; (b) putting the victim’s sexual organ into the victim’s sexual organ; and (c) putting the victim’s fingers into the victim’s sexual organ (hereinafter “the first facts charged in this part”); and (d) around April 20, 2014, putting the Defendant’s fingers into the victim’s sexual organ by taking advantage of the victim’s condition that the victim was unable to resist due to sleep; and (b) putting the fingers into the victim’s sexual organ (hereinafter “second facts charged in this part”); and (c) 2) the defendant did not have any fact near the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Seo-dong Hospital on April 10, 2014; and (d) 10, 2014.
3) The lower court determined that the victim’s statement on the date and time of each of the crimes in this part is specific and consistent, and the credibility is recognized in light of the background of the victim’s statement and the relationship between the victim and the Defendant, and found the Defendant guilty of all the facts charged in this part 1 and 2. 4)