The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined (to the extent of supplement in case of any statement in the appellate brief not timely filed).

The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning, the lower court was justifiable to have found the Defendant guilty of obstruction of the performance of official duties among the charges of this case on the grounds stated in its reasoning. In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on legality of performance

In addition, the argument that the court below erred in the misapprehension of the legal principles as to the offense of insult, or erroneous determination of facts and misapprehension of the legal principles is not a legitimate ground for appeal, as it is alleged in the ground of appeal that the defendant did not consider it as the ground for appeal or that

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.