1.(a)

The defendants receive each money listed in the separate sheet No. 1 column from the plaintiff.

1. In full view of the co-owned property partition method Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 7 and the purport of the entire pleadings, the plaintiff 40/1,581 shares in the copy of the register of 117 square meters (hereinafter "the land in this case"), defendant B shall own shares of 1,536/1,581 shares, and the networkO (hereinafter "the network") shall own shares of 5/1,581 shares. The deceased died on February 25, 1980, and the deceased's heir died on February 25, 1980, and the deceased's children died, and there are co-owned land (ma), K, K, L, M, M and deceased, P and P, which are adjoining land owned by the plaintiff (the deceased's spouse in this case), the deceased's land in this case and the deceased's neighboring land's land heir, the deceased's heir in this case's land and the deceased's neighboring land's heir in this case.

In light of the above facts of recognition, it is reasonable to divide the land of this case into the Plaintiff’s sole ownership, but the Plaintiff’s reasonable share price to the remaining co-owners.

2. First of all, we examine the remaining Defendants’ shares in inheritance except for Defendant B, the deceased’s heir, as the deceased’s heir.

The shares resulting from the death of the deceased are as follows:

Defendant C1/6 4/24 20/37,944 (=5/1,581 x 4/24) Defendant D1/64 x 4/24 x 4/24) Defendant D 11/6 /37,944 (=5/1,581 x 4/24) Defendant D 1/51.55 6/6/2437,944 (=5/1,581 x 6/244) Defendant J. 25/61/61/61, 581 x 1/581 x 1/244) Defendant K 1/64 x 1,581 x 1/24 x 2045 x 1/54125/425/1425/425/47) of the net P/425/1425/47)

Defendant E1.5 1.5/5.53/1190/417,384 (=30/37,94 x 3/11) Defendant F 11/5.5 2/115.5 2/417,384 (=30/37,94 x 2/11) Defendant G 11/5.5 2/1160/417,384) Defendant G 11/5.5 2/1160/417,384.