beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment of four years and six months, Defendant B's imprisonment of three years and six months, Defendant C's imprisonment of one year, and Defendant D.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
To the extent that basic facts are identical and there is no substantial disadvantage in exercising the defendant's right to defense, part of the facts charged was revised in accordance with the facts charged.
Of 2018 Gohap 122, 2018 Gohap 135, part of robbery and robbery 2018 Gohap 2018 Gohap 135, Defendant D’s robbery, bodily injury, and hostage robbery with the other co-offenders are described in this paragraph;
2018 Gohap 190
1. The robbery of Defendant A, B, D, and E and the robbery of hostages;
A. Defendant A, D, and E: (a) were Vietnamese nationals; (b) around April 2017, the victim G (limited to approximately KRW 25 million borrowed from Defendant A, and approximately KRW 45 million interest thereon; (c) around April 2017, Defendants A, D, and E were arrested the victim and detained the victim in a way of threatening the victim; (d) the victim and his family members; and (e) threatening the other persons; and (e) Defendant A and E arrested the victim in Busan casino; and (e) Defendant D took a misunderstanding of the victim at Defendant D’s house located in Busan H and 1st floor when the victim arrived; and (e) the victim took a misunderstanding of the victim at the victim’s arrival, the victim took the victim’s money and valuables by threatening the victim as above.
B. On June 9, 2018, at around 02:00 on June 9, 2018, Defendant A and E were found to have a victim from the same building underground parking lot located in the city of Busan on the same side, and Defendant E forced the victim to leave the back of the passenger car owned by Defendant A and prevented the victim from leaving the back of the victim. Defendant A driven the said vehicle at around 06:30 on the same day by driving the said vehicle to prevent the victim from getting off from getting out of the vehicle, and detained the victim by preventing the victim from getting out of the vehicle. During that process, Defendant A called “the principle of no taxation within the city” with the victim as “the principle of no taxation within the city” and received KRW 600,000 from the victim who suffered fright in cash.
In the indictment, the injured person moves to the office of defendant D.