All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence imposed by the lower court (one year and eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. In a case where there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared with the first instance court, and the sentencing of the first instance court does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect such a case (see Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). In light of the aforementioned legal doctrine, there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared with the lower court’s judgment because new data on sentencing have not been submitted in the trial, and circumstances in which the Defendant and the Prosecutor alleged for unfair reasons for sentencing (such as the following: (a) the circumstance in which the Defendant and the Prosecutor alleged that the sentencing were unfair; (b) the fact that the Defendant’s growth process was conducted; (c) the fact that the judgment was conducted simultaneously with the final judgment at the same time as the judgment became final and conclusive; and (d) the Defendant’s age, gender, environment, motive, circumstance, means and consequence of the crime; and (d) the lower court did not seem to have any undue or undue scope of discretion.

3. In conclusion, since the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.