logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.10.13 2016고정1352
상해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

When the victim C and the victim who return to death were pregnant, the Defendant demanded the birth of the victim, the victim would raise her child, and the victim would be dissatisfied with each other on February 2015.

1. On February 13, 2015, the Defendant of defamation: (a) connected the Defendant’s mobile phone to Kakakaook by using the Defendant’s mobile phone; (b) visited the Kakaook and booming the ter and the victim; and (c) referred the victim, “in 30 million won, the method of undermining the 3,000 won of intimidation and the method of undermining the risk of omission,” refers to the victim.

However, in fact, although the victim demanded 30 million won to the defendant, the victim was not threatened.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

2. On February 21, 2015, around 03:00 on February 21, 2015, the injured Defendant: (a) sent the victim’s cell phone to the victim’s cell phone by checking the Defendant’s cell phone contents; and (b) capturing the message contents; and (c) partly corrected the victim’s cell phone according to the witness’s legal statement, etc. according to the witness C in order to take the victim’s cell phone back. In both hands, the victim’s hand was pushed down on the wall, tightly pushed down, pushed down the victim’s body; and (d) the victim’s body was charged with the victim’s injury, such as the two sides and the one that requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

3. On March 18, 2015, at around 01:00, the Defendant entered the residence of the said victim and his father, who was aware of the password 104 Dong-dong, Daejeon, Daejeon, at the residence of the said victim and his father C, opened the joint entrance of the first floor, and opened the Belgium No. 1301, and infringed upon the victim’s residence by opening the Belgium No. 1301.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C’s legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. A complaint;

1. Data to cut the Kakao Stockholm;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Damage photographs;

1. Notice of each decision on information disclosure;

1. The 112 patrols;

arrow