The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (one hundred months of imprisonment, two thousands of additional collection, thirty thousands of money) is too unreasonable.

2. There are extenuating circumstances such as the confession and reflection of the defendant, the defendant's cooperation in the investigation of narcotics, and the fact that there is no previous difference.

However, considering various sentencing conditions, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, criminal record, motive for the crime, circumstance after the crime, etc., the punishment imposed by the court below is too unreasonable, in light of the following circumstances: (a) the possibility of recidivism is high; (b) there is a heavy need for severe punishment for a crime with great social harm; (c) the amount of phiphonephones received by the Defendant is considerable; and (d) the Defendant again commits the crime of this case during the period of repeated crime due to a double crime.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit.