logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2020.10.08 2019구합85607
부당해고구제재심판정취소
Text

The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the part resulting from the participation.

Reasons

The plaintiff is a corporation established on June 29, 200 in accordance with the National Health Insurance Act, which regularly employs 3,667 workers, and carries out the function of evaluating the appropriateness of medical care benefit costs and medical care benefits.

On April 1, 2010, the intervenor employed the plaintiff as a research service and worked in the medicine management office, the treatment management office, the evaluation management office, etc.

On February 11, 2019, the Plaintiff notified the intervenors that “the contract term expires as of March 31, 2019.”

(2) On April 1, 2019, the Intervenor filed an application for remedy with the Gangwon Regional Labor Relations Commission on April 1, 2019, alleging that the dismissal was unfair, and the Gangwon Regional Labor Relations Commission cited the Intervenor’s application for remedy on May 23, 2019 on the ground that the Intervenor was converted to an employee without a fixed period of time on April 1, 2012, when the period of contract exceeds two years since the Intervenor did not constitute an exception to the restriction on the period of use under the Act on the Protection, etc. of Fixed-Term and Part-Time Workers (hereinafter “Period Act”).

On June 26, 2019, the Plaintiff appealed and filed an application for reexamination with the National Labor Relations Commission. The National Labor Relations Commission dismissed the Plaintiff’s application for reexamination on the same ground as the initial inquiry court.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant decision on reexamination” / [based on recognition] . (hereinafter referred to as “instant decision on reexamination”), written evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, 7, 8, and 13 (including a serial number; hereinafter the same shall apply), and the purport of the entire pleadings as to the legitimacy of the instant decision on reexamination, the gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion as to the legitimacy of the instant decision on reexamination is a public institution, and the research duties are one of the main

An intervenor was directly engaged in the research or the management of research services at a research institute and engaged in the support affairs directly involved in the research affairs.

In addition, an intervenor shall have earned income for the last two years since 2013.

arrow