The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for five years.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant 1) In light of the police statement on F, Defendant 1’s assertion of mistake of fact, it can be seen that the first offender was written with the statement “ July 27, 2009.”

At the time of July 27, 2009, the defendant, who was confined to the detention room of the Bupyeong-gu Police Station at the time of the defendant, asserted that he was aware of the fact, had no choice but to think that the alteration was made by the investigator D and G, who is the investigative police officer, if the date of the crime was the same. Therefore, the defendant had no intention to make a false accusation.

B) In the process of arresting the Defendant, G’s sexual indecent act against the Defendant and the Defendant’s theft of money was the fact that the accused did not have any intention without intention. C) reported to the effect that “the Defendant was stolen on July 27, 2009 from the Defendant.” The Defendant stated that “The Defendant cannot make a clear statement to the effect that he would have judged the Defendant.” If the contents of the F’s statement in the court are based on false facts, the F’s report would be based on the F’s report. If the F’s report are based on fact, the above legal statement would be false. If the F’s report is based on fact, the above legal statement would be deemed to constitute the above evidence, and thus, the Defendant did not have intention to do so. D) At the time of the appellate court’s transfer of the case against the Defendant, the Defendant did not have any intention, and thus, the Prosecutor did not have made a statement to the Defendant that “the Defendant had stolen the goods from the date of theft, and thus, did not have any intention to do so.”