logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2016.07.05 2016고단1340
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 14, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and four months of suspension of execution to interfere with business by the Ulsan District Court on April 14, 2016, and is currently pending in the appellate trial.

1. On April 9, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (after-accidents), driving a B MT vehicle around 23:10 on April 23, 2016, and driving the intersection in front of the “D” store located in Ulsan-gu C, Ulsan-gu, the Defendant moved the intersection from the bank of the SK Sports Center to the bank of the supervising church at the speed of the speed.

At the time, she was so she was placed at the intersection and the intersection did not have a signal, so there was a duty of care to check whether a vehicle engaged in driving of a motor vehicle temporarily stops to cross the intersection by reducing the speed prior to entering the intersection and temporarily stopping the intersection, and to prevent the occurrence of an accident by bypassing after entering the intersection.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to enter the intersection, and due to the negligence bypassing it, received the part of the victim E-driving’s right-hand door of the Fgystro, driving, driving the intersection from the left-hand side of the running vehicle to the right-hand side of the Defendant’s driving vehicle.

In order to reach an amount equivalent to KRW 1,263,938, the Defendant did not immediately stop and take necessary measures after destroying the upper right even door of the said van, in light of the above occupational and practical aspects.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) the Defendant driven the said mast car in the state of alcohol alcohol alcohol level of about 1.5 km from the front road of the sound market in the south-gu, Ulsan-gu, Sim-gu, Sim-gu, Simsan-gu to the front road of the same Dong-dong apartment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a report on actual condition investigation;

1. Each photograph;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving, report on the detection of the driver involved in driving, and inquiry of the results of crackdown on drinking;

1. Making teas;

1. A vehicle estimate;

1.Each.

arrow