logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2013.08.21 2013고합266
특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(횡령)
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six years.

An application for compensation by an applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2013Gohap266, 273] Defendant A conspiredd to make and handle a false statement without depositing funds from the corporate account of the victim company, or to make and process a false statement from November 22, 2002 to April 2013 by the director in charge of accounting of the victim company G (hereinafter “victim company”), Defendant B from November 15, 2002 to February 28, 2013, while serving as the director in charge of accounting and accounting of the victim company from November 15, 2002 to February 28, 2013. The Defendants conspired to embezzled the funds of the victim company by withdrawing funds from the corporate account of the victim company without making an abundry list.

Defendant

B around January 2, 2008, at the victim company accounting department and office, in the victim company accounting department and office, voluntarily withdraws 15,000,000 won under the name of paying taxes from the victim company’s bank account (I) under the name of the victim company managed by the Defendants, and then deposit it into the victim company’s own account. Defendant A embezzled 15,00,000 won in the course of business for the victim company by approving the withdrawal money list, and from that time, Defendant A embezzled 15,00,000 won in the course of business for the victim company, and then deposited money from the victim company’s corporate account managed by the Defendants over 193 times until November 27, 2012, or deposited money from the victim company’s corporate account managed by the Defendants at his own discretion, and used it as the funds for the purchase of the Defendants’ real estate.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired and embezzled the amount of 7,029,500,000 won owned by the victim company, which was under the business custody for the victim company, by arbitrarily consuming it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to J;

1.Each.

arrow