logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.09.28 2017고단2288
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The judgment is as shown on the facts charged in the indictment (Provided, That the suspect is referred to as "defendant") 2.

A. The prosecutor prosecuted the above charged facts by applying Articles 86, 83(1)2, and 54(1) of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995, and amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005).

B. Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545, Mar. 10, 193; Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995; Act No. 4920, Jun. 1, 1993); Article 84 of the former Act provides that "where an agent, employee, or other worker of a corporation commits an offense under Article 84 subparagraph 1 and 2 with respect to the business of the corporation, a fine under the relevant provision shall be imposed on the corporation; Article 201 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995; Act No. 2010, Dec. 30, 2005; Act No. 3651, Aug. 1, 2008; Act No. 20651, Aug. 28, 2006; Act No. 2010, Feb. 1, 2007>

Thus, the facts charged of this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow