Defendants shall be punished by a fine of five million won each.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fines, only 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] Defendant A was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the Seoul Central District Court on July 26, 2012 and two years of suspended sentence, and the above judgment was finalized on December 9, 2012. Defendant B was sentenced to four months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the Seoul Western District Court on April 12, 201 and two years of suspended sentence, and the above judgment was finalized on April 20, 201, and on November 26, 2013, the Seoul Central District Court sentenced eight months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the Seoul Central District Court on December 4, 2013.

【Criminal Facts】

The Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E site owned by D, etc., was about about about 10 years ago and about 56 households, but the new construction project was conducted, due to the lack of funds from the owner, etc., the civil litigation was continued due to the occurrence of a dispute between the contractor's mountain construction and mountain construction. The above construction project was suspended for a long time, and it was difficult to know at any time at which

On the other hand, although the representative director was registered as G in the name of the company F, the company lending the name of the contract in accordance with the actual credit relationship, etc., the Defendants were aware of the fact that the Defendants, despite the absence of any authority delegated by the owner D or the operator of F Co., Ltd. with respect to the construction of the above loan from H, they received money from the old office that they would make a complex legal relationship to the construction business operator start up with the introduction fee that they want to start up the construction business.

1. On June 2008, Defendant B made a false statement to the victim I that “F Co., Ltd. constructed a sublet in the land E site of Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, with a well-known knowledge of the president, introduced it to enable it to carry out stone construction work.” Defendant A misrepresented the above company’s representative director by carrying out the name of the FF representative director.”

However, there is no connection with the Defendants at the time, and therefore, they enter into a construction subcontract in the name of F Co., Ltd.