(영문) 대구지방법원 2014.01.15 2013노1940 | 리걸엔진

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원 2014.01.15 2013노1940

강요등

Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is without merit that the Defendant committed a harmful act identical to that stated in the facts charged of this case against the victim.

During the marriage period, the victim sold the defendant's property to the defendant and tried to achieve his/her intention by having the defendant detained the defendant by self-harm that the defendant did not respond to it. In the case of this case, the victim did harm in favor of the above reasons and divorce and division of property, and the victim voluntarily prepared and delivered to the defendant.

2. Facts charged;

A. At around 20:00 on June 20, 2012, the Defendant suspected that the Defendant’s wife of the Defendant (hereinafter “the Defendant”), at the Defendant’s home located in Gumisisisisi, sisisisi (hereinafter “the Defendant”), she saw the Defendant as “the Defendant’s wife of the Defendant (hereinafter “the age of 51”) to avoid wind,” and she saw the Victim as “the Victim, a day, a day, a day, a large number of years, a day, a day, a day, and the Victim’s face as a result, she saw the Victim’s face once again, and she took the Victim’s title once again, she sawd the Victim for approximately two weeks of treatment.

(2) Around 01:00 on June 30, 2012, the Defendant: (a) under the influence of alcohol at the foregoing place; (b) caused the victim’s face and her breast part, etc. on the ground that the victim had worked and returned late; and (c) caused the victim to suffer bodily injury, such as catum dump, which requires approximately three weeks of treatment.

B. Around 01:00 on June 30, 2012, the Defendant forced the Defendant to prepare five copies of the joints that read, “The Defendant did not file a complaint against the victim,” who assaulted the victim at the aforementioned place, and that he did not raise any objection against the victim who was drinking, even if he did not go to go against, due to a mistake in the process of doing so.” (hereinafter “instant joints”).

As such, the Defendant does not have a duty to assault the victim and let the victim frighten.

유사 판례

-대구지방법원 김천지원 2013.06.12 2013고단45

-전주지방법원 2020.10.08 2020고합77

-대전지방법원 천안지원 2012.10.12 2012고단1163

-대전지방법원 2015.10.30 2015고단2814

-수원지방법원안산지원 2020.11.27 2020고단3797