The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the victim first gets the arms of the defendant so that the defendant was deprived of the defendant's arms, and the defendant did not fall into self-defense because he was deprived of the victim's losses, and thus, he was removed as well as that he was removed by plucking, plucking, and did not inflict an injury on the victim's losses, and it constitutes self-defense.

2. The court below rejected the Defendant’s assertion under the title “determination on the Defendant’s and his defense counsel’s assertion” in the judgment of the court below. The court below, based on the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below and the court below, acknowledged the following circumstances as follows: (i) Defendant also acknowledged that the victim’s grandchildren did not fall from the Defendant’s body and were removed from the Defendant’s body; and (ii) the victim’s grandchildren did not appear to have a bad condition before the victim’s dispute with the Defendant; (iii) E at the investigation agency, the Defendant and the victim’s grandchildren were disputed; and (iv) the victim was consistently removed from the investigative agency on August 28, 2017, and then the victim took the right side of the victim’s finger, and (v) the victim was given a written confirmation of the victim’s finger seat to the Defendant’s hand, and (v) the victim was issued with the victim’s hump, the victim was issued with the victim’s hump.

Therefore, customers are not present and showed.