logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원성남지원 2016.04.29 2015가단16926
전부금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 3,343,200 as well as 5% per annum from June 26, 2015 to April 29, 2016 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The basic facts of the contract of this case (the payment of the cost of construction) ① The contractor (the defendant; the same hereinafter the same shall apply) shall pay the contract amount in 15 equal installments each year and pay it in advance each year after the 15th anniversary of the date on which the contractor (a level energy; hereinafter the same shall apply) separately agrees (hereinafter “the first payment date”) as a result of the full completion of the obligation to complete the responsibility of the contractor, the contractor (the defendant; hereinafter the same shall apply).

However, the amount equivalent to the value-added tax on the contract amount shall be paid to the Do-grade amount equivalent to the value-added tax on the refund date from the tax office.

On June 24, 2013, the Defendant concluded a contract for the construction work of solar power plants (hereinafter “instant construction work”) at KRW 1,404,540,000 with respect to the payment of the construction cost (hereinafter “instant contract”) with the maximum energy company (hereinafter “accuracy energy”), as follows.

B. Afterward energy, the instant construction was normally completed within the contract period.

C. Meanwhile, the Plaintiff filed an application against the Plaintiff for a payment order claiming construction cost of KRW 568,042,288 and damages for delay thereof. The payment order became final and conclusive on May 3, 2014.

(Usunam District Court 2014 tea903) d.

In addition, the Plaintiff filed an application for provisional attachment against the Defendant and the garnishee’s claim amounting to KRW 568,042,288 on March 28, 2014, with the effect that “568,042,288 out of the construction cost of the instant case against the Defendant of the Maximum Energy” was provisionally attached on March 28, 2014.

(Court 2014Kadan50276). e.

Then, the plaintiff is the defendant with the maximum energy and the third debtor based on the payment order finalized as above.

arrow