1. The defendant

A. As to KRW 13,640,682 and (i) thereof, KRW 13,040,040 among the Plaintiff A, the Plaintiff’s KRW 13,040 from November 24, 2018 to May 31, 2019.

1. Basic facts

A. On April 11, 2006, the head of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government publicly announced the public inspection of the residents’ public inspection and the public announcement of the project implementation authorization for the designation of the improvement zone for the F Housing Redevelopment Improvement Zone (hereinafter “instant improvement zone”).

(E) On September 15, 201, the head of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government publicly announced the authorization for the implementation of the F Housing Redevelopment Improvement Project (hereinafter “instant rearrangement project”) implemented by the Defendant.

(H) H. (b)

The adjudication of expropriation by the local Land Tribunal of Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter referred to as the "land expropriation adjudication of this case") made on August 25, 2017, the land expropriation adjudication of each of the buildings to be expropriated of this case (hereinafter referred to as the "land expropriation adjudication of this case") was made as the owner or co-owner of the attached buildings (hereinafter referred to as the "building subject to expropriation of this case") located within the rearrangement zone of this case.

Serial Name Shares 1 A A A 1 A Robro part of the brick structure slves of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul J ground ground, two-story neighborhood living facilities and housing 12 B B, Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government office 6/20 3 net I Dozer L ground and Switzerland and 2-story housing 1

C. The deceased I died on July 3, 2018, and Plaintiff C, D, and E, a child, became co-inheritors.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 2 through 5, 18 (including virtual number), Eul evidence 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to Plaintiff A’s claim

A. On November 21, 200, Plaintiff A acquired ownership of the building subject to accommodation of this case on November 21, 200 and resided in the building subject to accommodation of this case from January 15, 2001 to November 16, 2017, after the date of the instant decision on expropriation, does not have any dispute between the parties, and Plaintiff A does not have a settlement money, relocation expenses, and relocation expenses.