This case shall not be under the jurisdiction of the court.

1. Attached Form 1 to the facts charged of this case / [1]

2. Article 4(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that land jurisdiction shall be the place of crime, the address, the domicile, and the present place of residence of the defendant, or the current place of residence. It is determined that both the crime scene stated in the facts charged in the instant case and the domicile, the domicile, and the present place of residence of the defendant do not fall under the jurisdiction of this court, and no other evidence exists to acknowledge that the court has jurisdiction over the land

According to the records, it is recognized that the defendant submitted a written application to the effect that on June 28, 2016, before the statement about the defendant's case, the defendant had no jurisdiction over this case, the court should pronounce a judgment of violation of jurisdiction.

Thus, since the prosecution of this case was instituted in violation of jurisdiction, it is decided as ordered in accordance with Articles 319 and 320 of the Criminal Procedure Act.