logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.05.26 2016가합55758
청빙결의무효확인 등
Text

1. Of the instant lawsuit, the part of the claim for nullification of the withdrawal resolution against the Plaintiffs is dismissed, respectively.

2. The plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The defendant is a church belonging to the G local council under the F religious organization located in Dong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City E, and the plaintiffs are those who received the resolution of withdrawal from the administrative council composed of the members of the defendant church on August 7, 2016.

B. The Defendant, on November 16, 2014, retired from office by H on the part of the Defendant, who was in charge of the Defendant’s clerical services, left office, and announced a public announcement to visit the Defendant’s office on December 31, 2014, following the Defendant’s articles of incorporation of the Defendant church pursuant to Article 10; 2) pursuant to the above public announcement of the ice, more than 90 pastors were provided to the Defendant’s office ice, and the Cheongice Committee selected eight candidates from among the applicants following the document review on January 18, 2015, selected three of the above eight candidates from among the applicants as the final candidates on March 15, 2015, and the final three candidates from March 29, 2015 to the Defendant’s office.

Since then, on April 12, 2015, the defendant administrative body held a bearer voting to select the defendant's master pastor as publicly notified in the defendant's note, and D was elected as a temporary master in the above voting.

C. A resolution 1 on the admission of a member of the Defendant’s Office of Affairs (hereinafter “Defendant’s Office of Affairs”) attached the Defendant’s temporary recruitment as a member of the Defendant’s temporary recruitment for one year after the Cheong-ice resolution. The head of the Defendant church held on March 6, 2016 the voting on whether D is admitted as a member of the Defendant’s regular gathering on May 8, 2016 and decided to grant D’s gender as a member of the Defendant church from December 1, 2015 through D’s members of the Defendant church from December 24, 2016, which was posted on April 24, 2016 after deducting the Defendant’s regular gathering on May 26, 2015 from the voting date’s list was invalid.

arrow