logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2014.10.23 2014고단5433
위증
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment with prison labor for one year.

However, this decision is delivered to the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B On May 15, 2014, the Busan District Court sentenced the violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective, deadly weapons, etc.) and one year of imprisonment with prison labor, and two years of suspended execution, which became final and conclusive on May 23, 2014.

1. While Defendant B was accused of the fact of intimidation and threatening E and was investigated by the police around December 2012, the Defendant stated that “When a witness A was requested to submit a written statement from the police officer in charge of him/her on May 2013, he/she stated that “If he/she is deemed to have known that he/she would have become aware of it,” he/she said that “A will take means of sending a written statement,” and that he/she had A submit a written statement of intimidation on May 4, 2013 to the police officer in charge.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, upon receiving a trial at the Busan District Court, ordered A to have the witness present at the Busan District Court, and contacted A with a policeman on February 2, 2014, and applied for a witness to A as the case. At the low time, the Defendant testified as the written statement submitted to the police station at the low time. It would be sufficient to give testimony only on this point.) and caused A to have the witness give a false testimony.

Accordingly, on February 20, 2014, the above Gap appeared and taken an oath as a witness of the defendant case, such as violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (collectively, deadly Weapons, etc.) to the above court 2013da7825 B (Defendant) in Busan District Court Decision 451, which was located in the So-gu Busan District Court, on February 20, 2014, the above witness testified as "I do not know the witness," and continuously testified as "I do not answer the question," "I am the witness, who is going above the part of E, and I am the witness," and continuously testified as "I am the witness," and the prosecutor's "E" made a threat that the defendant (B) will kill him while s his head and immediately spel him, and any of the above questions is raised.

arrow