The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

A. In fact-finding (a special violence against C) there is no fact that the defendant was at the time of her her son with the victim C or faced the remaining her son with the victim.

Nevertheless, the court below found the defendant guilty of this part of the facts charged, and the court below erred by misunderstanding facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The punishment sentenced by the court below (4 months of imprisonment with prison labor for each of the crimes of Article 1 of the judgment of the court below and 10 months of imprisonment with prison labor for each crime of Article 2 of the judgment of the court below) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. In other words, the circumstance that can be recognized by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the judgment of the court below and the court of original instance as to the assertion of mistake of facts is consistent with the victim's statement from the investigation agency to the court of original instance. ① The victim has consistently stated that "the defendant has met her bucket with the defendant, left the buck with the buck, left the buck with the buck, and the defendant got the victim, and the victim has lost the buck with the left hand," ② The victim at the scene of the crime of this case stated that "I considered the defendant's bump with the victim's statement", and R also stated that "the defendant has bump with the victim's statement", ③ the victim has no intention to agree on if the defendant paid the bump value due to violence, etc., and there is no special wish to make the victim's statement in light of the victim's economic intent to receive compensation as stated in the facts charged."