A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 1, 2016, 22:30, around the C District District in Gyeyang-gu, Incheon, the Defendant: (a) expressed the Defendant’s desire to d policeman belonging to the police officer belonging to the said District, who shouldered the Defendant to return home to the Defendant upon the Defendant’s request by the Defendant, because the Defendant did not take a cab on her taxi; and (b) expressed the Defendant’s desire to “Chewing typ, sick sick,” without getting off from the taxi; (c) assault the said D with her face and her chest by going off; and (d) listened to the above D’s talk that “I have taken a photograph, because I have taken it.”

씹할 놈 아, 뭘 로 찍냐,

D. The Defendant expressed his desire to “Iskin,” and expressed his desire to “Isknish, Isknish, Isknish,” and the Defendant’s hand, thereby obstructing the legitimate execution of duties in relation to the protection of police officers’ life, body, and property.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a photograph, each internal report (the examination of images at the time of arrest, words and actions at the police station of the person suspected of being arrested), investigation report (the case of speech and actions in the course of escort in the police room of the person accused), written inquiry, such as video recording CD, criminal history, and a criminal report (the confirmation of the details of punishment for each suspect) shall apply;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act / [the scope of recommended punishment / [Interference with the performance of official duties] The basic area (from June to January, 1) of Type 1 (Interference with the performance of official duties / coercion of official duties) and the scope of comparative sentence between punishment and recommendation: Six months to one year and four months (decision of sentence], and the defendant expressed a desire to the police officer dispatched.