logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.02.21 2016고단8019
조세범처벌법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On May 25, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of five months for a violation of the Illegal Check Control Act at the Busan District Court on May 25, 201, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on March 4, 2016.

[2] The Defendant, from August 1, 2006 to March 31, 2015, run a wholesale and retail business with the trade name “D” in Busan Dongdong-gu, Busan, from around August 1, 2006 to around March 31, 2015.

1. The Defendant, who was not issued a tax invoice on June 30, 2014, supplied E with a total amount of 56,936,363 won, etc. at the above D office to E who is an unregistered business entity, but did not issue a tax invoice to E.

2. On July 25, 2014, the Defendant issued a false tax invoice, stating an excessive amount of KRW 33,227,273 as stated in the [Attachment Table 2] No. 2 to December 31, 2014, that the Defendant supplied F with goods equivalent to KRW 33,162,727,727 as the supply price was supplied to F, and issued false tax invoice by stating an excessive amount of KRW 6,727,27,273 as if the Defendant supplied goods equivalent to KRW 39,890,00.

3. On November 3, 2014, the Defendant issued a false tax invoice of KRW 994,250,000 in total supply value as shown in [Attachment 5] Nos. 5 and 22 from around that time to November 25, 2014, even though there was no fact that goods were supplied to Pakistan Co., Ltd., the Defendant issued false tax invoice of KRW 198,50,000 in the above D office.

4. On July 25, 2014, the Defendant received false tax invoices, as stated in the [Attachment 23-35] No. 23-35] from around July 2014, 2014, the Defendant received false tax invoices as if he received false tax invoices as if he had not received goods from G, even though he had not received goods from G. In addition, from around that time to December 30, 2014, the supply amount of KRW 1,267,000,000 is false.

arrow