Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who has been in the custody of public funds and public funds of the pertinent village as well as the Drogate from July 2008 to July 2013.

1. The Defendant, from October 10, 201 to December 31, 2012, embezzled the amount of KRW 10,343,792, out of KRW 10,592,317, which was deposited and kept in the Agricultural Cooperative Account E, under the name of the Defendant, by arbitrarily using the amount of KRW 1,592,317.

2. Around October 17, 2011, the Defendant, while having deposited and kept oil support expenses subsidized in the future of the above center for senior citizens in the account, embezzled fuel support expenses worth KRW 1,635,00 in total in four times from that time by the same method as indicated in attached Table 1, 2, 6, and 7, including: (a) the Defendant paid the oil value with the above oil support expenses; and (b) the Defendant embezzled the oil support expenses worth KRW 1,635,000 on credit from the G oil station located in Seocheon-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun; and (c) the Defendant embezzled the oil value with the oil value of KRW 2,600 in the same way as indicated in attached Table 1, 2, 6, and 7.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness H, I and J;

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of the police Nos. 2, 3 and 5 against the accused;

1. The police statement of K;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of a community settlement of accounts, a copy of the settlement of accounts of senior citizens' center, a copy of the account settlement statement for senior citizens, and a copy

1. Articles 356 and 355 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the assertion by the Defendant and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The alleged defendant and his defense counsel used the defendant's personal money deposited in the public fund custody account, and the clause 2 of the judgment is formed according to the result of the residents' meeting. Thus, it constitutes embezzlement.