1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning for the judgment concerning this case is as follows: (a) the court’s entry of this case is identical to the entry of the reasoning of the judgment in Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, with the exception of changing “this court” from 3 pages of the judgment of the first instance to “the first instance court”.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The parties’ assertion 1) The Defendant, as indicated below, withdrawn money from the account in the name of H child care center and the account in the name of D kindergarten, or transferred money from the Defendant’s personal account (NAF), without justifiable grounds. [Attachment 3] The Defendant did not modify the Defendant’s claim for additional embezzlement from October 15, 2004 to April 9, 2012, our bank 862,268,3902, from April 27, 2004 to March 207, 2007, from April 27, 2007 to July 38, 2012, the Plaintiffs added the amount that the Defendant embezzled from the Defendant’s personal account (However, the Plaintiffs did not modify the purport of claim).

(3) On May 31, 2012 to August 28, 2012, 20, 20,276,095 1,320,928,127 D Kindergartens 4 on April 30, 2012 to 92,857,7805, and 96,06,06,700, the sum of 20,320,328,927, 127, 30, 306, 208, 306, 306, 205, 30, 306, 205, 30, 167, 30, 206, 306, 205, 306, 306, 205, 306, 305, 306, 205, 306, 306, 307, 29636, 365, 3636, 27,

Therefore, it is therefore.