A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On May 11, 2007, the Defendant issued each summary order of 3.5 million won by the same court on April 11, 201, for the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Seo-gu District Court Branch Branch of the Daegu District Court on May 11, 2007.

【Criminal Facts】

On July 15, 2016, while under the influence of alcohol content 0.064% without a driver’s license, the Defendant driven B 1 km car at approximately one kilometer in front of a mutually unclaimed restaurant located in the main Dong-dong, Seogu, Daegu-gu, to the front day of a 120 Donam bath, Nam-gu, Seoul-gu, to the front day of a 120 Donam bath.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the status of the driver;

1. A driver's license inquiry;

1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records, inquiry reports, and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes reporting criminal investigations;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 1, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting a crime (the point of a sound driving) and subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 152 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act is the number and time of punishment for the same kind of crime; the numerical value of blood alcohol concentration at the time of driving under the same case; the defendant's age, character and conduct, intelligence and environment; motive, means and consequence of the crime; and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the punishment as ordered shall be determined in consideration of various factors of sentencing as shown in the argument of this case.