The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the purport of the grounds for appeal that the defendant is in depth and actively cooperate in the investigation, that the defendant is the age of 20 middle group, and that each of the crimes of this case was committed by contingently, as long as the defendant's living conditions during the running period, etc., the punishment sentenced by the court below (the crime of 1 to 4 in its holding: imprisonment with prison labor for 1 year, and fine of 1 million won for 5 in its holding) is too unreasonable.

2. In our criminal litigation law, which takes the trial-oriented principle and the direct principle, there is no change in the terms and conditions of sentencing compared to the first instance court, and where the first instance court’s sentencing does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect it (see Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). In this case, there is no special circumstance or change in circumstances that may be newly considered after the pronouncement of the lower judgment.

In addition, considering the circumstances surrounding the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., and the reasons for sentencing of the lower judgment on the grounds of appeal, considering the various circumstances asserted by the Defendant on the grounds of appeal, the lower court’s punishment is too unlimited and it is not determined that the Defendant exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.