logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원원주지원 2017.08.17 2016가합5586
손해배상(기)
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

Basic Facts

The relevant plaintiffs are married between the parties.

Defendant D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd.”) is a company with the objective of investment consultation, management consultation, real estate leasing, sales agency, real estate consulting, real estate auction business, etc., and Defendant C is a person who is in office as an auditor of the Defendant Co., Ltd.

Plaintiff B plans to be awarded the instant E in the procedure of the auction of the real estate Hacheon District Court Hacheon District Court Hacheon Branch, which is proceeding with respect to the land of 33 parcels of land in the original city in the original city in the original city. To that end, on November 30, 2009, the Defendant and the Defendant entered into a standard model contract with each of the following terms: “The comprehensive outsourcing service at Plaintiff B’s request, the real estate auction consultation, the right analysis, the consulting service on the real estate auction, and other incidental services for the efficient fulfillment of the following: (a) the service scope between the Defendant and the Company: (b) the “the comprehensive outsourcing service at Plaintiff B’s request, the real estate auction consultation, the right analysis,” and (c) the service fee was KRW 150,00,000,000, respectively.

(hereinafter referred to as “Arriishing contract of this case.” On December 7, 2009, Plaintiff B received a bid for the instant Erri land under the Plaintiff’s name in the auction procedure for the said real estate auction. On February 4, 2010, after fully paying the sale price, Plaintiff A completed the registration of ownership transfer for the instant Erri land under the Plaintiff’s name.

However, as the I asserting a lien on the instant Eri land could not receive the instant Eri land due to the assertion of the lien, Plaintiff B would file a lawsuit against Plaintiff A to request for the delivery of land. To this end, on May 6, 2010, the Defendant Company: (a) collected all materials to receive land from the lien holder who occupies the instant Eri land; (b) submitted them to the attorney in charge of the lien lawsuit; and (c) faithfully perform the business to receive the instant Eri land after winning the lawsuit.

Plaintiff

B The defendant company shall be entrusted with the business of the defendant company.

arrow