logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2013.08.20 2013고단1110
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving Obane.

around 10:15 on March 21, 2013, the Defendant driven the above Oralba, and driven the roads of four lanes in front of the modern department stores in Seocho-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, with four lanes in the direction of the new village distance from the East Tri-do.

Since there are crosswalks where signal lights are installed on the front door, in such a case, there was a duty of care to check whether there is a person who gets on the road driving service at the front door and to check the front door well by reducing the speed, and to drive safely according to the new code.

Nevertheless, due to negligence of disregarding that the vehicle driving signal is a stop signal, the victim C (if 80 years old) who cross the crosswalk from the right side to the left side is found to have been immediately discovered and operated, but the defendant did not avoid the situation and did not go beyond the left side part of the victim's front side.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as blood transfusion, due to the above occupational negligence, during approximately eight weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, and Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents in the Selection of Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act (Selection of Fines; hereinafter referred to as the degree of injury to the victim; although the degree of injury to the victim is serious, it shall be taken into account that the defendant deposited four million won

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

arrow