The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (two years of imprisonment) on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant is necessary to strictly punish and eradicate the crime of this case in light of the addiction to narcotics and harm caused by medication of narcotics, etc. In particular, since the crime of this case among the above crimes is committed by the defendant's voluntary presentation of 13.84g of penphones handled by the crime of this case, it is favorable that he made a confession to the investigation agency first, as well as the statement and arrest of other narcotics-related criminal, etc. However, while the crime of this case is committed by the defendant two times, the crime of this case is committed not only by the defendant, but also by the sale of penphones (18.02g of penphones) but also by other narcotics-related criminal, it is necessary to strictly punish and eradicate the crime of this case in light of the punishment of this case in light of the degree of addiction to narcotics, harm caused by medication of narcotics, etc. The crime of selling narcotics among the above crimes is spreading more than that of other narcotics-related crimes and thus, it is necessary that the defendant has been sentenced to punishment more than 20 years of imprisonment with prison labor for the same kind of crime of this case.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.