1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On May 30, 2014, the C Child Care Center located in Busan Dong-gu, Busan (hereinafter “instant Child Care Center”) was designated as an integrated child care center for disabled infants. The Plaintiff is the head of the said Child Care Center and D, respectively, registered as the child care teacher of the said Child Care Center as the Plaintiff’s wife.

B. On March 25, 2015, the Defendant conducted an on-site investigation on the instant childcare center (hereinafter “instant on-site investigation”) and discovered the fact that the Plaintiff was registered as the head of the instant childcare center on the childcare integration system, but in fact, D was performing the head’s role, such as parent counseling and document preparation, and that D was not in compliance with the child support ratio by performing the head’s role.

C. Accordingly, on May 14, 2015, the Defendant issued an order to recover a subsidy of KRW 1,539,000, ② a disposition to impose a penalty surcharge of KRW 9,00,000 in lieu of the three-month period of suspension of operation, ③ a disposition to revoke the qualification of the head, ④ a disposition to collect the unjust enrichment of KRW 1,00,000, ⑤ a criminal charge and corrective order, ⑤ a disposition to file a criminal charge and corrective order, and on June 4, 2015, the Defendant issued a disposition to revoke the designation of a Consolidated

D. On July 21, 2015, the Busan Metropolitan City Administrative Appeals Commission filed an administrative appeal with the Busan Metropolitan City Administrative Appeals Commission, and the Busan Metropolitan City Administrative Appeals Commission revoked the revocation of qualification as the president during the above disposition on the ground that it cannot be deemed that the Plaintiff lent the name of the president to D because it was recognized that the Plaintiff played part of its president, and thus, the part concerning the criminal charge and corrective order was dismissed, and the remaining claims were ruled to be dismissed.

(1) Of the measures described in the above sub-paragraph (c) above, the Defendant’s order for recovery of KRW 1,539,000 for subsidies remaining following the above adjudication; disposition for imposition of KRW 9,00,000 for penalty surcharges in lieu of three months of suspension of operation; disposition for collection of KRW 1,00,000 for unjust gains; and disposition for revocation of designation of integrated child care centers for disabled infants; hereinafter “instant disposition”). 【No dispute exists; Party A, and 1,7.