logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2019.02.15 2017나56512
구상금
Text

1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

3. The judgment of the court of first instance is ordered.

Reasons

A. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, and thus, the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following parts. As such, the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited it

2. The second part of the judgment of the court of first instance, “Defendant Company” in the second part of the judgment of the court of first instance, shall be deemed to be “Defendant Company B (hereinafter “Defendant Company”)”, and “H” in the third part, the third part and the 6th part and the 12th part shall be deemed to be “C”.

(c) Loss (based on recognition: Evidence Nos. 6, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15; evidence Nos. 14, and 15; the result of the appraisal of the medical records by K University Hospital; the overall purport of the pleadings) of the victim is as specified in the attached Table.

1) Active damage: 17,351,464 won = 10,980 won for future treatment expenses of KRW 5,493,284 in future treatment expenses of KRW 5,77,700 in direct non-treatment expenses of KRW 877,700 in passive damage: 207,707,707 (the daily wage for cargo driving and the rate of labor disability loss of KRW 44.78%) * Amount after offsetting the amount of negligence of KRW 157,541,419 in the court, including the recent medical records of the victim: 157,541,419 [3] positive damage amount of KRW 17,351,464 in active damage amount of KRW 17,57,707,707,707,707) 】 The ratio of the defendants' liability to damages amount of damages to the victim's occupational accident of KRW 3050,410 in the case, 305010

D. The scope of the Plaintiff’s right to indemnity is as seen earlier, that the Plaintiff paid insurance proceeds of KRW 127,404,030 to the victim. Therefore, the Plaintiff may claim for reimbursement against the Defendants within the scope of KRW 127,404,03, which is the lesser of KRW 127,404,030, which is the amount of the insurance proceeds calculated in accordance with the terms and conditions of the injury security agreement with the Defendants of the victim, and KRW 127,541,419, and KRW 127,403.

In the end, it is eventually.

arrow