(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2014.04.01 2013고단3451

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2014.04.01 2013고단3451

배임수재

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. From around 2005, the Defendant and the related parties worked as the director of the E-listed corporation, the vice president from around 201 to around 201, the representative director of the E-listed corporation, and the director of the E-listed corporation, G is the director of the E-listed corporation, and H is the director of the marketing headquarters and the vice-director of the E-listed corporation, and J is the K representative director of the K-listed corporation, which is a business agent for selecting the Ban (VN), a credit card and cash receipt settlement and approval service.

2. Acceptance of property in breach of trust;

A. A. As the representative director of the E-BA, the E-BA-affiliated F is engaged in the business affairs in charge of overall management of the above company, such as the selection of a partner company, business operation, general affairs, personnel management, accounting, and fund management, and the Defendant was engaged in the business affairs assisting the F as the vice president of the E-

Therefore, F and the Defendant performed duties fairly on the basis of objective evaluation of the service performance capabilities, service quality, etc. of service companies in relation to the selection of service providers and the maintenance of bareboat service contract. In this regard, there was a duty that should not receive money or valuables from interested parties, such as related persons of service companies, etc., or receive money or valuables in return.

B. Around December 2008, the Defendant received illegal solicitation and the money and valuables from the E-building dispute resolution office in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and through G, the J requested that “The K-B-B-A-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B

As such, the defendant selected K-A-B-based business entity, which represents the I-B-A-based dispute resolution committee.

유사 판례

-서울서부지방법원 2014.06.13 2013고단3396

-서울행정법원 2015.02.05 2014구합5736

-서울남부지방법원 2015.12.04 2014가합112508

-서울남부지방법원 2014.10.16 2014가합100291

-대전지방법원 2018.06.07 2015가단9797