[Defendant A] Imprisonment with prison labor for six months

[Defendant B]

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months;

2. Provided, That this shall not apply.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On December 29, 2015, Defendant A sentenced Defendant A to ten months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, etc. at the Suwon Friwon, and completed the execution of the sentence on September 30, 2016.

[Criminal facts]

1. The Defendants’ co-principal committed the crime showed the attitude that the seller was able to purchase the Obatoba. However, Defendant B induced the seller to another place, Defendant A destroyed the Obaba, and Defendant A conspired to purchase the Obaba by lowering the price of the batoba in order to lower the price of the batoba.

A. On July 21, 2017, around 00:50, the Defendants: (a) at the vicinity of the entrance of the Western coal station located in 75-60, Samsi-si, Yasi-ro 15, Samsi-si; (b) according to the above conspiracy, Defendant B confirmed the victim C as if he were to purchase Oraba; and (c) induced the victim to a nearby convenience store by “the victim is confirmed as to whether the payment was made; and (d) Defendant A did not go to a propeller adjacent to the engine engine, thereby impairing the victim’s utility so that Orabab, the victim’s owner, can be seen as repair costs.”

As a result, the Defendants conspired to damage the victim's property.

B. Defendants who attempted to commit fraud shall act as if they were to purchase Obane as above at the time, place, and Defendant B’s place specified in the above 1’s A, and Defendant A shall not attempt to sell the victim’s “the victim was out of order with Obane and attempted to sell it in fraud.”

As the engine and the endor are broken out, 1.5 million won of the repair cost is 700,000 won, half of the original selling price, because the engine and the endor are out of order.

“A false representation was made.”

As a result, the Defendants conspired to induce the victim, and attempted to acquire 700,000 won of the difference by purchasing 700,000 won of the market value of the victim's property from the injured party, but the victim rejected.