beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
(a) Plaintiff’s entry into the Republic of Korea and refugee application - Plaintiff’s nationality: AB - Entry and refugee application: June 6, 2015 (Status of Sojourn: Tourism Department (B-2)) / Application for refugee status on June 8, 2015
B. The Defendant’s decision not to recognize refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) - Grounds for not recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”): No sufficiently-founded fear of fear that is likely to be harmful to gambling may be recognized.
(c) Plaintiff’s objection and decision of dismissal - Decision of dismissal: The fact that there is no dispute on March 23, 2016 [based on recognition], Gap’s evidence Nos. 1, 2, Eul’s each entry, 1, 2, and 3, and the purport of the whole pleadings.
2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful
A. The Plaintiff asserted that he/she was a member of the Ga, a member of the Ga, a member of the Ga, a member of the Ga, a member of the Ga, a member of the Ga, a member of the Ga, a member of the Ga, a member of the Do, was selected on January 2015. In May 24, 2015, the Ga, a member of the Ga, a member of the Ga, was subject to violence against the Ga, a member of the Ga, a member of the Ga, a member of the Ga, and a member of the Ga, a member of the Ga,
B. Determination 1) Article 2 subparag. 1 of the Refugee Act provides that “Refugee” means a foreigner who is unable or does not want to be protected by the country of nationality due to well-founded fear to recognize that he/she may be injured on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, membership of a specific social group, or political opinion, or a stateless foreigner who is unable or does not want to return to the country in which he/she had resided before entering the Republic of Korea due to such fear.” In full view of the following circumstances revealed by adding the entire arguments to the evidence, evidence, evidence No. 4 and evidence No. 5 as mentioned above, and evidence No. 2, and evidence No. 4 and No. 5, the Plaintiff cannot be seen as “a well-founded fear based on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, membership of a specific social group, or political opinion,” and it may be acknowledged otherwise.