1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to be paid additionally shall be revoked.

1. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the facts of recognition are the same as the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, they are cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The court's explanation on this part of the liability for damages is the same as that of the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing it as it is by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

3. Scope of damages.

A. As a result, the Plaintiff suffered losses of KRW 1,120,00 from lost income (i.e., daily wage of KRW 80,00 per day x 14 days) due to the instant assault, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff KRW 1,120,00 and damages for delay. However, the lost income shall be calculated in accordance with the standards that properly reflects the property value of the victim’s labor ability (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2011Da82063, 82070, Nov. 14, 2013). Furthermore, the Plaintiff’s labor disability loss rate is not merely a medical and physical skill impairment rate, not a mere occupational and occupational skill disorder, the degree of occupational experience and skills disorder, the degree of occupational disability and other similar occupational disability, and the possibility and probability of occupational disability and other social and economic circumstances, and there is no evidence to acknowledge that the Plaintiff was no more reasonable and objective evidence of the Plaintiff’s remaining evidence and evidence of evidence 2017.