A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant 2016 senior group 5849 is a person who served as the vice head of “B” corporation.

Around February 5, 2015, the Defendant: (a) at the Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government New-dong, the Defendant, despite the absence of the ability to receive the outstanding amount from the victims who are market merchants, made a call to the victims C, and received the outstanding amount from the merchants of the D original market through C C through the merchants of the D original market; (b) at home, the Defendant may receive the outstanding amount from the market merchants who have attempted to collect the outstanding amount; (c) at 15% to 20% of the outstanding amount of the collected amount of the claim as a successful allowance, the Defendant would act as the legal suit. In order to proceed with the lawsuit related to the collection of the claim, the Defendant’s false statement is that “The payment of 10% of the collected amount of the claim shall be made preferentially with the deposited amount as the deposit money from the victims; and (d) on February 5, 2015, the Defendant received KRW 200,000 from the victims on the deposit account from the victims, and entered it in the attached Form 30 to 30.210.21.

2. 2017 Highest 2259 Defendant is a person who is in charge of business and debt collection in a stock company B.

On July 19, 2016, the Defendant: (a) on July 19, 2016, the phone calls asking F for the collection of claims from the victim F at an unsound place located in the Dong-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Gwangjin-gu, to receive all the money damaged; and (b) first, the Defendant’s inquiry about the debtor’s property such as the passbook

In this paper, I changed.

However, even if the defendant received money from the victim because of economic difficulties at the time, he did not have the intention or ability to collect the claim for the victim.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above, and is the provisional attachment deposit of the head of the Tong on July 19, 2016, under the name of the debtor's property inquiry, from the damaged person.