1. The defendant is based on the original copy of a notarial deed with executory power No. 352 of the document No. 2016 drafted No. 2016.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Defendant filed an application for the seizure of corporeal movables under the Incheon District Court No. 2018No. 44777 based on the executory exemplification of notarial deeds No. 352, No. 352, 2016, in relation to B (F). On July 10, 2018, the execution officer of the Incheon District Court made a seizure execution of corporeal movables as indicated in the attached list (hereinafter “instant corporeal movables”) located within the Michuhol-gu Incheon apartment and Hho (hereinafter “instant apartment”).

B. The plaintiff is the father of B, and after completing the registration of ownership transfer on the apartment of this case on August 29, 2007, he had resided in the apartment of this case with wife I and IJ around that time.

C. Meanwhile, B has a child who was born in 2002, 2009, and 2012, and upon divorce around 2015, completed the move-in report on the apartment in this case.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence No. 18, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The above findings of the judgment and the following facts are revealed: (a) the types and items of the instant corporeal movables; (b) the possession and residential relation of the instant apartment in which the instant corporeal movables are located; and (c) the respective entries and videos stated in the evidence Nos. 2 through 10, 12 through 16, and 20; and (d) the overall purport of the pleadings; (b) the Plaintiff submitted the data purchased the instant corporeal movables through their respective cards or account transfer; and (c) the transaction specifications of the instant corporeal movables agents; (d) it appears that the Plaintiff or the Plaintiff purchased most of the instant corporeal movables by the Plaintiff, I, and J; (e) although the instant corporeal movables were moved into the move-in report of the instant apartment, the Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff resided in the instant apartment only after divorce and resident registration around 2015; and (e) at the time of compulsory execution, the Plaintiff discovered possession of the instant corporeal movables in B, except the instant apartment products and the health insurance products of B’s children.