logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 홍성지원 2016.10.26 2015고단764
사기등
Text

Defendant

Of the facts charged against A, the forgery of private documents and the uttering of the perjury and the defendant B shall be acquitted, respectively.

Reasons

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. The Defendants purchased a vehicle from Defendant A’s relative victim D by borrowing the name of purchase of the vehicle, and conspired to dispose of the relevant vehicle at the time of the victim’s death and to encash it.

Defendant

A in the “F” of the victim’s operation “F” in the early January 1, 2011, for the victim’s operation “F”, the victim is required to have a vehicle to find a job in Seoul, but it is not possible to purchase the vehicle under the current credit problem. The vehicle installment means that the vehicle is leased to the purchase name of the vehicle due to internal burden,” and the victim borrowed KRW 26,30,000 from Hyundai Capital Capital on November of the same month to purchase the vehicle in the victim’s name, and then let the victim purchase the vehicle in the victim’s name, and then, at around the 14th day of the same month, he dried from the victim on the 14th day of the same month, and the Defendant sold the vehicle in the above highest PP and around the 20th day of the same month after the Defendant got the vehicle in the above highest PP from Defendant A at around that time.

However, the Defendants purchased a vehicle in the name of the victim and planned to dispose of it immediately, and there was no intention or ability to normally bear the principal and interest borrowed in the name of the victim at the time of purchasing the vehicle.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to deception the victim, and then defrauded the victim with the above-mentioned vehicle of 26,300,000 won at the market price.

B. The Defendants: (a) forged private documents; (b) conspired to use the certificate of transfer of vehicles in the name of D in order to sell the vehicles purchased in the name of D to a third party as described in the foregoing paragraph (a).

Defendant

A around January 14, 2011, the Plaintiff received one certificate of his personal seal impression and one certificate of his personal seal impression from D under the pretext of establishing a right to collateral on the low-est passenger car from “F” as stated in the above paragraph A, and then deliver it to Defendant B. Defendant B is the deceptive person of transferee H at the vehicle registration office of Daejeon Metropolitan City, Daejeon Metropolitan City, Daejeon, Daejeon, on January 20, 201.

arrow