A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On November 20, 2017, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 5 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in the Daejeon District Court’s Support for Incheon District Court.

【Criminal Facts】

1. The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of freight cars B Ⅲ in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury) and the Road Traffic Act (Non-accident after accidents);

At around 15:30 on April 26, 2020, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle and continued to turn to the left at the oppy of A, while driving on the road in front of D in the official city C.

At that time, there was a duty of care to make a left-hand turn to a person engaged in driving service, because the road was on which the center line of yellow solid lines is installed.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected the above duty of care and caused the fault of left-hand turn of the cargo vehicle as it is, and caused the victim E (the 54 years old)’s knife knife knife knife knife knife of the Fknife knife knife knife,

As a result, the Defendant, by negligence in the course of business, sustained injury to the victim, such as salt ties and tensions, which require treatment for about two weeks, and at the same time, destroyed and damaged the above victim’s vans to take necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim immediately, and escaped after parking the Defendant’s vehicle in the vicinity of the accident place.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (refluence of drinking level measurement) in and after the occurrence of a traffic accident as described in the foregoing paragraph (1) and escape from the same day, the Defendant was requested to comply with a drinking test in the manner of inserting alcohol in and around 17:40 on the same day, because there are reasonable grounds to recognize that he was driving under the influence of drinking, such as being categorized as a driver of the accident from the G District at the public police station in the vicinity of D as the driver of the accident from H around the G District of the public police station, making the face fastening, etc.