Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant became aware of the victim C (the age of 36) through Internet carpet "B", and tried to file a lawsuit to revoke the marriage between the victim and her husband.

around 10:00 on June 16, 2015, the Defendant: (a) given and received text messages with the victim’s mobile phone; (b) incurred married foreign capital between the victim’s husband and the victim’s husband before her husband married; and (c) received text messages with the victim’s mobile phone.

He listened to the contact point of the suspected female, made the female and the telephone, and notified the result to the victim.

Since June 16, 2015, the defendant sent a text message about the above contents to the victim and his mobile phone with the victim and received it from the victim. Accordingly, there was a request to do so.

In doing so, “packer Access System”, “Packer Program”, “Packer Program may show her chest,” and “Packer Sacker Program.”

The text message, “,” was sent to the victim’s cell phone.

Accordingly, the Defendant sent a text that may cause sexual humiliation or aversion through mobile phones to the victim with a view to meeting his own sexual desire.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Articles of evidence (the contents of text dialogue);

1. Investigation report (the details of text of cellular phone to be submitted by an complainant);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint and statement explaining reasons for complaint;

1. Article 13 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes and Selection of Fines concerning the crime;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. proviso to Article 16(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Exempted from Order to complete program (the principle prohibiting disadvantageous changes is applied in cases where only the defendant requests formal trial)

1. Although the reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is not good for the instant crime, the Defendant recognized the instant crime and reflected against the Defendant.