1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The reasons for this court’s explanation are the same as the written judgment of the court of first instance, except for addition or dismissal under paragraph (2) below, and thus, they are cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. A part concerning addition or height;

(a) Forms 7 and 11 of the judgment of the first instance are as follows.

The following facts do not conflict between the parties, or described in Gap evidence 1 to 13, Eul evidence 1 to 8 (including a Serial number; hereinafter the same shall apply).

) The testimony of the witness C in part of the first instance trial, the result of the examination of some parties to the plaintiff in the first instance, the result of the commission of physical examination to the director of the D Hospital in the first instance court, the result of the commission of physical examination to the director of the E hospital in the first instance court and the director of F hospital, the result of the commission of each medical examination to the director of the E hospital in the first instance court and the director of F hospital, the

B. No. 2 and No. 3 of the first instance judgment “No. 2 and No. 3” are referred to “No. 3 witnesses of the first instance court as “No. 3 witnesses of the first instance court”.

(c) Forms 4 through 11 of the first instance judgment are as follows.

(4) As alleged by the Defendant, the Defendant did not explain to the Plaintiff all the circumstances acknowledged by the aforementioned evidence that the terms and conditions of the insurance contract of this case, even if the J fetus does not constitute the insured under the terms and conditions of the insurance contract of this case, and thus, constitutes an important part of the insurance contract, and thus, constitutes the subject of the duty to specify and explain. In full view of all the circumstances acknowledged by the aforementioned evidence, it is reasonable to deem that the Defendant did not explain to the Plaintiff the terms and conditions that the Plaintiff was unable to receive the insurance money stipulated in the special agreement of this case because the Plaintiff did not constitute the insured under the condition of the fetus. Therefore, the Defendant cannot assert