(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.02.04 2014가단66969

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.02.04 2014가단66969

구상금

Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. As to KRW 32,131,262 and KRW 31,250,262 among them, Defendant A shall be from August 23, 199 to December 1, 200.

Reasons

1. As to the grounds for the claim, in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings, the facts constituting the grounds for the claim indicated in the attached Form No. 1 and No. 5 can be acknowledged. Thus, the Defendants shall perform the respective obligation of prohibition of claim as set forth in the attached Form No. 1

2. As to the assertion of Defendant B, C, D, and E, the above Defendants were tried to approve the inheritance of the deceased F, and the deceased’s small property exceeds the positive property, they asserted to the effect that the Plaintiff’s claim against the above Defendants is without merit in its entirety.

On the other hand, the qualified acceptance of inheritance is not limited to the existence of an obligation, but merely limited to the scope of liability, so long as the qualified acceptance of inheritance is recognized as the existence of an inherited obligation even in cases where the qualified acceptance of inheritance is recognized, the court shall render a judgment on the performance of all the inherited obligation even if the inherited property does not exist or the inherited property is insufficient to repay the inherited obligation. However, since the obligation of an inheritor is of a nature not to enforce compulsory execution against the inherent property of an inheritor, the court shall specify the purport that it can be executed only within the scope of inherited property in the text of the judgment on performance

(1) The defendants' obligation to pay money in itself is not limited to the defendants' obligation to pay money in accordance with the above legal principle. Thus, the defendants' obligation to pay money in itself is not limited to the defendants' obligation to pay money in accordance with this legal principle.

(a).

Since the enforcement force has already been restricted as stated in the paragraph, such as “within the scope of the property inherited from the network F,” the above Defendants’ assertion is without merit, without further review.

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is justified.

유사 판례

-대구지방법원서부지원 2015.04.30 2014가단21117

-서울중앙지방법원 2014.10.29 2013가단5185495

-서울중앙지방법원 2016.02.16 2015가단5187396

-서울중앙지방법원 2015.12.29 2015가단5155146

-서울중앙지방법원 2015.12.08 2015가단106163