Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant, around December 31, 2015, posted a letter stating that “B” in the “B” online following the Internet page was sold, and then reported it to the victim C, who was under contact with the Defendant, was a product in 2015, but was a product in 2015, and was deceiving the victim C to be a product in 2015. Accordingly, the Defendant was transferred KRW 1.4 million from the said victim’s account in the name of the Defendant.

2. On January 3, 2016, the Defendant posted a notice stating that “Wing wing wing wing wing wingW oral” was sold in the Internet NAE” camera, and then posted it to the victim F, who reported it to the victim F, even though the product is not good in the product’s condition, “it is unnecessary to lack any defect.”

“Dispatching letters, etc., text messages.”

As the oral situation is good, it was deceiving the victim, and it was transferred KRW 600,00 to the Agricultural Cooperative Account D in the name of the defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statements concerning crimes No. 1 in the judgment of the defendant and legal statements concerning crimes No. 2 in the judgment of the defendant;

1. The F and C’s written complaints, written statements;

1. Each investigation report (Submission of data on the details of transfer from a seller G, details of inspection direction, victim F and suspect statement, victim C and suspect statement);

1. Colors of a camera-type screen to be sold;

1. Data to close a text message screen;

1. A statement of details of each transfer and data on the closure of the screen;

1. Details of letters sent and received by the first seller;

1. The details of transfer of KRW 1,350,00 to the first seller [as to the crime No. 1 of the judgment of the Defendant, the Defendant purchased the crowdfunding product, which is a sold product, in 2015.

In addition, although the above crowdfunding product was not a product in 2015, the victim C did not ask the product in 2015 and purchased with the product in 2015, it was alleged that there was no deception. However, the following circumstances, which can be known by the evidence as follows, i.e., ① the Defendant’s notice on the sale of the crowdfunding product in 2015 as stated in the judgment, i.e., “the time of purchase: the time of purchase; the price at the time of purchase: 2.1 million won at the time of purchase; and the front machine.