beta
Text
The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.
The request of the applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.
Reasons
I. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant borrowed 50 million won for the Company E, an employee of the said Company, even though the Defendant borrowed f money from G running the Company several times, but failed to receive 60 million won among them.
Using the defective opportunity for the above 60 million won, the victim had the intention to recover the above claim against G from E by forging a promissory note as if he had the guarantee.
1. On March 20, 2014, the Defendant forged securities: (a) around 15:50, in the Defendant’s passenger car set up in the parking lot for a certified judicial scrivener office located in the Dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-
Since the Defendant received reimbursement of KRW 50 million from E on August 13, 2014, the Defendant returned or disposed of the said Promissory Notes as collateral, notwithstanding the fact that the said Promissory Notes should be returned or disposed of to E, the Defendant stated the issue date of the said Promissory Notes in the column of “No. 16, 2014,” from October 15, 2014 to November 24, 2014 for the purpose of collecting the claims of KRW 60 million against the said G.
Accordingly, the Defendant violated the agreement to dispose of, even though the underlying claim, which was the object of collateral, was extinguished on August 13, 2014, and forged the Chapter of E Promissory Notes in the name of E, stating that the date of issuance of the said Promissory Notes between October 15, 2014 and November 24, 2014, was “No. 16, 2014.”
2. Exercising forged securities;
A. On November 24, 2014, the Defendant applied for provisional attachment of real estate for E-owned Seoul apartment in a promissory note work document prepared in the Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, 85-1, the Seoul District Court.