beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff is an insurance company that has entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract by designating C as the insured for D vehicles owned by C and C (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) and as a designated driver, and the Defendant is an association that entered into an automobile insurance contract with F Vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant”).
B. On September 23, 2018, on September 23, 2018, the Plaintiff’s vehicle (A driver) turned to the left (e.g., the left) from 203 Fri-ro 203 (e., one lane) to 616-road (e.g., two lanes) from the e., Fri-ro 203 (e., two lanes) to the e.g., the part of the Defendant’s driver’s seat of the Defendant’s vehicle located in accordance with G elementary school signal from one lane 616, Fri-ro, Fri-ro to the right side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle (hereinafter “instant accident”).
None signal of green (finite) signal G
C. On November 15, 2018, the Plaintiff paid KRW 825,160,00 to H, who was on board the Defendant’s automobile due to the instant accident under the automobile insurance contract with the said C, as damages for medical expenses, etc.
[Ground of Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, 6 (including virtual numbers), Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 6, and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Determination on the cause of the claim
A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion is that, as the gold 616 km as the instant accident occurred, the restricted speed was 30km/h as the children’s protection zone, but at the time of the instant accident, the Defendant’s vehicle was operated at a speed of at least 50km/h, and even if the Plaintiff’s vehicle entered the instant intersection in advance than the Defendant’s vehicle, the Defendant’s vehicle was proceeding without driving and temporary suspension, while the instant accident occurred, the error ratio of the instant accident between the Plaintiff’s vehicle and the Defendant’s vehicle would be at least 2:8 or 5:5.
Therefore, the defendant.