logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.02.10 2016고단3664
산지관리법위반등
Text

Defendant

A Decision 1-C

1) Each of the crimes of KRW 1,00,00,00 as stated in the judgment, and KRW 1-A, (b), and (c) as stated.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is sentenced to 4 months of imprisonment with prison labor and 2 years of suspended execution on December 2, 2015, in support of Sungnamwon, which was established on December 2, 2015, for a violation of the River Act, and is currently under suspended execution after the above judgment was finalized on December 10, 2015.

Defendant

A is a person who operated a general restaurant from around April 1985 to around April 2016 under the trade name of Gyeonggi-si, Gyeonggi-si, and D, and Defendant B is a woman of Defendant A, and Defendant B is a person who took over and operates the above “D” restaurant from around April 2016 to Defendant A.

1. Defendant A

(a) No person who violates the management of a mountainous district shall divert a mountainous district without obtaining permission from the head of a forest or any other person to divert the mountainous district;

Nevertheless, on March 2016, the Defendant engaged in the mination work to use forest land of 142 square meters as parking lots without obtaining permission from the competent authorities in the Gyeonggi-si, Gwangju-si, 2016.

As a result, the defendant converted the use of mountainous districts without obtaining permission from the competent authorities.

(b) A person who intends to divert farmland in violation of Acts and subordinate statutes shall obtain permission from the competent authorities;

Nevertheless, on March 2016, the Defendant, a farmland outside the agriculture promotion area, did not obtain permission from the competent authorities, and performed the mination work to use the answer of 320 square meters as a parking lot.

Accordingly, the Defendant diverted farmland without obtaining permission from the competent authorities.

(c)

Any person who violates the River Act shall obtain permission from the competent authority from a person who intends to occupy and use land, occupy and use river facilities, construct, rebuild or alter a structure, excavate, lay the ground, change the form and quality of land, alter the form and quality of land, collect soil, rocks, sand or gravel in a river area.

1) On January 2013, the Defendant installed a steel-frame bridge with a size of 7 square meters without obtaining permission from the competent authority, in G (Gu), which is a border river area.

2) On March 2016, the Defendant is an outdoor place of business, without obtaining permission from the competent administrative agency, from H (Ocheon) and one parcel outside of a river area, and is deemed an outdoor place of business.

arrow