Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for four months.

, however, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who has operated a commercial sex acts business in the name of "E equipped with 11 smuggling rooms in Suwon-si D, 3 floors, 2 shower rooms, and 2 rooms for women engaged in sexual traffic," and Defendant B is a person employed as an employee of the above business.

Defendant

A generally manages the above business establishment, and Defendant B solicits to provide guidance to customers who find the above business establishment in return for resolving the board and lodging at the above business establishment, and Defendant B, around October 7, 2014, instructed the police officer who pretended to be the male customer at the above business establishment to receive cash of KRW 120,000 in return for sexual traffic from the police officer who received cash of KRW 120,000 in return for sexual traffic and provided guidance to the above business establishment for sexual intercourse, and brought sexual traffic women into the above room to sexual intercourse.

As a result, Defendants conspired to act from October 1, 2014 to October 7, 2014 (Defendant B: from October 3, 2014 to October 7, 2014) and arranged sexual traffic for business purposes as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of the statutes on the monthly rent contract for commercial buildings;

1. The Defendants who choose the relevant Articles of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and punishment for the crimes: Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, and Article 30 of the Criminal Act.

1. Defendant A: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Additional collection of Defendant A: Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic [the amount of KRW 840,000 = (the amount of KRW 80,000,000,000 at the prosecutor's office, but the Defendant A stated that "the amount of KRW 80,000,000,000" was "the amount of KRW 80,000,000,000,000)"; Defendant A made a statement at the prosecutor's office that "three to four persons," but Defendant A made a statement that "three to three persons per day," in favor of Defendant A

1. Defendant A of the provisional payment order: Reasons for sentencing under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;

1. The scope of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines [the scope of the recommended sentence] shall be at least 19 years of age.