All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor and one year and six months), which the court below sentenced to the Defendants, is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment appears to have led to the confessions of all the facts of the instant crime and reflect in depth. In the case of Defendants B and C, there is no criminal power, and Defendant A has no criminal power beyond the suspended execution. The Defendants do not want the punishment of the Defendants under the agreement with some victims, and some victims are expected to have repaid the amount of damage.

However, in full view of the defendants' age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime of this case, various sentencing conditions stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the circumstances before and after the crime, and the scope of recommended sentencing guidelines by the Sentencing Commission, the sentence of the judgment of the court below is too excessive and unfair. Thus, the defendants' assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. As such, the Defendants’ appeal is without merit, and all of them are dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.