1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

3. The judgment of the court of first instance is rendered on January 1, 2015.

The reasons why the court of the first instance, citing the instant case, is the same as the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for dismissal or addition as set forth in the following paragraph (2), thereby citing it pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. The second second part of the judgment of the first instance, referring to the "Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents" in the former Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (wholly amended by Act No. 14567, Feb. 8, 2017).

The "Housing Redevelopment Improvement Project" that reduces the second 14th to the "Housing Redevelopment Improvement Project".

The second 15th "2017...." shall be "2007..."

The second term " November 20, 2014" shall be read as " November 20, 2014."

8 The term "loan" that reduces 15th shall be read as "the next term".

The term " June 8, 2015" in the 19th third place shall be changed to " June 9, 2015".

The following shall be added to the "(i)" of the 8th 7th tier of the addition:

According to the fact-finding results of this Court on Ulsan Metropolitan City, the improvement plan for the project site of this case was proposed by the Defendant with the consent of at least 2/3 of the owners of the land, etc., and accordingly, the Defendant also may propose the formulation of the improvement plan with the consent of at least 2/3 of the owners of the land, etc., and the following is added to the “point” of the 8th 16th th th th th of

As the Defendant also submitted a report on the completion of precise safety diagnosis services to the head of Ulsan Metropolitan City on December 24, 2014, the Defendant stated that “The owner of the Esio-Japanese Housing site refuses the safety diagnosis, and the consent of the establishment of the association in the future would no longer be deemed to be able to conduct the safety diagnosis of the location of the site,” it may be practically impossible to implement the instant project in the instant project site including the Esio-Japan Housing site (Esio).